18 P.2d 1118

ROGERS v. PIHLSTROM.

No. 13,206.Supreme Court of Colorado.
Decided January 23, 1933.

On motion to dismiss writ of error.

Writ Dismissed.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR — Dismissal. Writ of error will be dismissed where the proceeding is not docketed until after the expiration of one year from the date of judgment.

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver, Hon. Frank McDonough, Sr., Judge.

Page 174

Personal appearance by plaintiff in error.

Mr. JAMES F. JACOBS, for defendant in error.En Banc.

MR. JUSTICE HILLIARD delivered the opinion of the court.

JUDGMENT was entered below November 6, 1930, and not until November 10, 1932, was the case docketed on error. November 25, 1932, defendant in error, who has not otherwise appeared here, moved to dismiss the writ of error pursuant to rule 18, which provides that such proceeding shall not be brought after the expiration of one year. On the personal application of plaintiff in error we have since awaited appearance of counsel for her in opposition to the motion. None has been made. The point is clear and to dismiss the writ seems imperative. Let that be the order.

Tagged:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *