LUTTRELL v. INSURANCE CO., 99 Colo. 76 (1936)

60 P.2d 225

LUTTRELL ET AL. v. LONDON AND PROVINCIAL MARINE AND GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY.

No. 13,936.Supreme Court of Colorado.
Decided July 27, 1936.

On motion to dismiss writ of error.

Motion Denied.

1. APPEAL AND ERROR — Appellate Practice. Where a case is tried upon a written stipulation of facts, on presentation for review, motion to dismiss for the reason that the only error assigned is the alleged insufficiency of the evidence and that there is no bill of exceptions making it a part of the record, is denied, it appearing that the stipulation was contained in the transcript of the records and files of the trial court certified by the clerk as containing true and correct copies of the files and records of his office.

Error to the District Court of Moffat County, Hon. Charles B. Herrick, Judge.

Mr. SID PLEASANT, for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. LOWELL WHITE, Mr. HOWARD ROEPNACK, for defendant in error.In Department.

MR. JUSTICE BUTLER delivered the opinion of the court.

THE defendant in error moves to dismiss the writ of error for the reason that the only error assigned is the alleged insufficiency of the evidence and that there is no bill of exceptions making it a part of the record. The case was tried upon a written stipulation of facts duly signed and filed with the clerk of the district court. It appears in the transcript filed with the clerk of this court.

Page 77

Reliance is placed upon a case decided by us before the adoption of our Rule 27a, effective April 8, 1935. In that case we held that an agreed statement of facts, to be considered by us, must be made a part of the record by a bill of exceptions. See Truesdale v. County Commissioners of Montrose County, 44 Colo. 416, 99 Pac. 63. The present practice is prescribed by our Rule 27a, which provides that “Copies of records and files of the clerk of the trial court shall be certified by him and all other portions of said transcript, save the assignments, shall be certified by the trial judge.”

The written stipulation of facts in the present case constituted a part of the records and files of the clerk of the trial court and the transcript was certified by him as containing true and correct copies of said records and files.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE CAMPBELL and MR. JUSTICE HILLIARD concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 60 P.2d 225

Recent Posts

PEOPLE v. SCOTT, 494 P.3d 651 (Co. App. 2021)

494 P.3d 651 (2021)2021 COA 71 The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.…

2 years ago

SOICHER v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO., 2015 COA 46 (2015)

351 P.3d 559 (2015)2015 COA 46 DeeAnna SOICHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

3 years ago

BEDOR v. JOHNSON, 292 P.3d 924 (2013)

292 P.3d 924 (2013)2013 CO 4 Richard BEDOR, Petitioner v. Michael E. JOHNSON, Respondent. No.…

5 years ago

FRIENDS OF DENVER PARKS, INC. v. DENVER, 327 P.3d 311 (2013)

327 P.3d 311 (2013)2013 COA 177 FRIENDS OF DENVER PARKS, INC.; Renee Lewis; David Hill;…

5 years ago

GENERAL PLANT CORP. v. IND. COMM., 146 Colo. 191 (1961)

(361 P.2d 138) THE GENERAL PLANT PROTECTION CORPORATION, ET AL. v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF…

8 years ago

WISEHART v. MEGANCK, 66 P.3d 124 (Colo.App. 2002)

Larry N. Wisehart, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael Meganck and Vectra Bank Colorado, NA, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01CA1327.Colorado…

8 years ago