IN RE ESTATE OF BERGHOLDS, 639 P.2d 1086 (Colo.App. 1980)

In the Matter of the Estate of Vilis Bergholds, Deceased, Milly Valks v. Rasma Krabacher, as personal representative of the Estate of Vilis Bergholds, Deceased

No. 80CA0099Colorado Court of Appeals.
Decided August 21, 1980. Certiorari denied November 10, 1980.

Appeal from the Probate Court of the City and County of Denver, Honorable James R. Wade, Judge.

Theodore B. Atlass, P. C., Theodore B. Atlass, for petitioner-appellant.

George A. Hinshaw, P. C., George A. Hinshaw, for respondent-appellee.

Division I.

Opinion by JUDGE COYTE.

[1] Petitioner, Milly Valks, appeals the judgment of the probate court denying her petition to compel reimbursement for death taxes paid by her. We affirm. [2] At the time of his death, the decedent, Vilis Bergholds, held three savings accounts in joint tenancy with petitioner. Petitioner, in order to obtain an early release of the funds in the savings accounts, filed a Colorado Inheritance Tax Statement and on November 14, 1978, paid $1,497.04 in inheritance taxes to the State of Colorado. The first publication of the notice to creditors was filed January 12, 1979. On May 17, 1979, petitioner filed a petition in the probate court seeking reimbursement for the taxes paid. [3] Petitioner contends that she is entitled to be reimbursed for the taxes which she paid because of the following provision of decedent’s will: [4] “I direct that all estate, inheritance and other death taxes payable by reason of my death on any property included in my Estate for tax purposes shall be paid as an expense of administration without contribution from any person and without apportionment.” [5] Although the inheritance taxes arising under the joint accounts here at issue would fall within the purview of this clause, when claimant voluntarily paid the tax, she became a creditor of the estate. Section 15-12-803(2), C.R.S. 1973, provides that a claim against an estate arising at or after the decedent’s death must be presented within four months after it arises or be forever barred. The one exception to this rule is inapplicable here. Accordingly, since petitioner’s claim was not filed within this four month period, it is barred by § 15-12-803(2), C.R.S. 1973. [6] Judgment affirmed. [7] JUDGE VAN CISE and JUDGE KIRSHBAUM concur.

Page 1

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle

Recent Posts

PEOPLE v. SCOTT, 494 P.3d 651 (Co. App. 2021)

494 P.3d 651 (2021)2021 COA 71 The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v.…

2 years ago

SOICHER v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTO. INS. CO., 2015 COA 46 (2015)

351 P.3d 559 (2015)2015 COA 46 DeeAnna SOICHER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE…

3 years ago

BEDOR v. JOHNSON, 292 P.3d 924 (2013)

292 P.3d 924 (2013)2013 CO 4 Richard BEDOR, Petitioner v. Michael E. JOHNSON, Respondent. No.…

5 years ago

FRIENDS OF DENVER PARKS, INC. v. DENVER, 327 P.3d 311 (2013)

327 P.3d 311 (2013)2013 COA 177 FRIENDS OF DENVER PARKS, INC.; Renee Lewis; David Hill;…

5 years ago

GENERAL PLANT CORP. v. IND. COMM., 146 Colo. 191 (1961)

(361 P.2d 138) THE GENERAL PLANT PROTECTION CORPORATION, ET AL. v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF…

9 years ago

WISEHART v. MEGANCK, 66 P.3d 124 (Colo.App. 2002)

Larry N. Wisehart, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Michael Meganck and Vectra Bank Colorado, NA, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01CA1327.Colorado…

9 years ago